Keep in mind that for this interface to work correctly, the types within the collection or structure must also implement IStructuralEquatable or provide their own structural equality logic.

Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.

Are the bonuses for infernal war machine weapon stations static, or are they affected by their user?

IStructuralComparable arayüzü, umumiyetle Array ve Tuple üzere bilgi kuruluşları tarafından uygulanır. Bu done konstrüksiyonları, elemanlarının sıralamasını ve yapısını dikkate alarak katlaştırma yapar.

I'm amazed that the most important reason is hamiş mentioned here. IEquatable was introduced mainly for structs for two reasons:

Your concern is that Object.GetHashCode() does not provide values that are stable and the concern is very valid as dirilik be seen in the first box headed by Caution in the documentation:

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by C# IStructuralEquatable nedir the user. But I'm hamiş really sure if I really got it.

The following example creates two identical 3-tuple objects whose components consist of three Double values. The value of the second component is Double.NaN. The example then calls the Tuple.Equals method, and it calls the IStructuralEquatable.Equals method three times. The first time, it passes the default equality comparer that is returned by the EqualityComparer.

Important Some information relates to prerelease product that may be substantially modified before it’s released. Microsoft makes no warranties, express or implied, with respect to the information provided here.

In addition to this awesome blog Frank and I also dicussed all of this awesome in detail on Merge Conflict on episode 111:

Net on a certain ortam, I'm compelled to issue the standard warning hamiş to rely on the values of hashcodes or how they are computed, since it is derece guaranteed to be the same across updates or platforms.

The example on MSDN gives part of the answer here; it seems to be useful for heterogeneous equality, rather than homogeneous equality - i.e. for testing whether two objects (/values) of potentially different types

The IStructuralEquatable interface supports only custom comparisons for structural equality. The IStructuralComparable interface supports custom structural comparisons for sorting and ordering.

The Equals method supports custom structural comparison of array and tuple objects. This method in turn calls the comparer object's IEqualityComparer.Equals method to compare individual array elements or tuple components, starting with the first element or component.